<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>alt.tech &#187; Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alt.tech.idealist.nu/category/standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alt.tech.idealist.nu</link>
	<description>Technology and Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:12:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Inhibited Standard Compliance</title>
		<link>http://alt.tech.idealist.nu/2007/12/inhibited-standard-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://alt.tech.idealist.nu/2007/12/inhibited-standard-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan Schiff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alt.tech.idealist.nu/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During my life as a web developer, I&#8217;ve been wasting many hours trying comply with web standards while designing websites. Right now, the process looks like this: 1. Designing in html/css2.1 using Bluefish and the Gimp. 2. Continuously testing the site using Firefox. 3. When pleased with the design, checking it using W3C&#8217;s html/css-validators. 4. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://alt.tech.idealist.nu/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/valid-css.png" title="Valid CSS" alt="Valid CSS" align="right" />During my life as a web developer, I&#8217;ve been wasting many hours trying comply with web standards while designing websites. Right now, the process looks like this:</p>
<p>1. Designing in html/css2.1 using <a href="http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/" title="Bluefish editor">Bluefish</a> and the <a href="http://www.gimp.org/" title="GNU Image Manipulation Program">Gimp</a>.<br />
2. Continuously testing the site using Firefox.<br />
3. When pleased with the design, checking it using W3C&#8217;s <a href="http://validator.w3.org/" title="W3C HTML Validator">html</a>/<a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/" title="W4C CSS Validator">css</a>-validators.<br />
4. Testing in using Internet Explorer (whenever I get access to it).<br />
5. Being utterly pissed at IE&#8217;s lousy support for web standards.<br />
6. Redesigning the site, avoiding IE&#8217;s flaws and removing some of the features that didn&#8217;t work out. (This is the part that seems to take the longest time)</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help to wonder what the web would be like if web designers didn&#8217;t have to be cramped by a certain software companys complete disrespect for standards. It seems to me like a wonderful thing. Maybe IE7 will help out, but the problem is that I have yet to see IE7 in action. That&#8217;s quite surprising, considering that I use quite a lot of different computers when I move around in the world. Microsoft seems to have some adoption problems going on&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m changing my process. I will be designing for web standards and the ones using IE will be served a different design, not that pretty, but working. (And they will get a link to download a decent browser.)</p>
<p>One more thing &#8211; please don&#8217;t complain about the lack of standards compliance on this blog&#8217;s html, I didn&#8217;t design it and won&#8217;t put the time it takes to redesign it. I have more important projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alt.tech.idealist.nu/2007/12/inhibited-standard-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

